Skip to content

Archive for March, 2009

What Would Google Do?

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

Less than 24 hours after the blast across the bow of GM and Chrsler by President Obama, newsmania and blogmania has devoured this event, licking its chops for more.  One blog refered to GM as Government Motors.  Some profess that GM will go to Chapter 11 as a means to find its new footing.  Maybe most interesting, Ford under the helm of Mulally is receiving high praise for the deep restructuring they underwent over the past 2-years.  Ford is suddenly the strongest, best managed and best run domestic auto manufacturer.  That’s an interesting story unto itself.

So what does GM, Ford and Chrysler have to do with Google?

Jeff Jarvis, a journalist of traditional roots recently wrote the book What Would Google Do (WWGD).  It’s one of those questions that could be asked of just about anything.  You see, since Google’s meagar start in this world less than 10-years past, it has become a behemoth, with 20,000+ employees. They’ve been a pioneer and a disruptor, taking on Microsoft, Yahoo and others. And along the way, it has created a pretty impressive resume, including phenomenal employee relations. I’m convinced that Google regards their employees as their number one asset.  Yet if I were lucky enough to spend a week inside Google and a second week inside GM, I’m certain there would be little similarity.  Google has a plan to move forward.  GM has a plan to step backwards slowly.  Google embraces entreprenuership.  GM has a well defined hierarchy that protects the status quo.  Google is a disruptor.  GM is a protector.  Google hires the brightest talent available.  GM use to hire the brightest talent available.  The list could go on and on.

The comparison of Google to GM is not the point of this blog post.  In the March 30th edition of Fortune magazine, the article, “Growing Pains - The Axman Comes to Google - New finance chief Pichette gets tough” by Adam Sashinsky caught my attention.  It states:

That’s right: Google, among the most chaotic, prolifigate, unfocused, engineering oriented, and self-proclaimed recession-resistant of organizations, had reached outside the Googleplex for a real business executive and charged him with ensuring that Google’s freewheeling culture wouldn’t become its own worst enemy.

It’s the last phrase “wouldn’t become its own worst enemy” that resonates with me, whether discussing, Google, GM, Ford, Motorola, and millions of other companies.  Because this is what so often happens.  We become our own worst enemy.  Its as if we play Darwin unto ourselves.  To prevent Google from a similar fate, Pichette has shut numerous projects, facilities and perks. Layoffs were announced. Hiring has been curtailed. The impact, expenditures have declined and free cash flow has increased.

 So what would Google do at GM?  My guess is, Google would have the Axman come, and then watch out. And in the end, GM would look significantly different. And I wonder if GM really has the guts to do what it knows it needs to do.  Welcome to the world of Darwin.

The Truth About Silent Problems Surface

Monday, March 30th, 2009

My book Without Warning details the toxic nature of silent problems.  Possibly the most dangerous problems to solve.  Today from the New York Post comes a story titled, “Star Power Dimming At Some Street Firms” (I hate that title).  Here’s a brief caption of the story.

Some of Wall Street’s harshest analysts — and, as it turns out, most prescient — are discovering that there’s a steep price for being honest.  A growing number of analysts who were either critical of the financial sector or were early raisers of red flags in the mortgage market are getting the cold shoulder from their employers, which has led to the analysts being forced out or silenced. ..  Highly regarded mortgage analyst Laurie Goodman, who when she worked at UBS was one of the first researchers to sound the alarm about the dangers of the subprime market, is said to have drawn the ire of UBS brass as her clarion calls crimped the bank’s ability to sell billions in bonds backed by subprime loans. Goodman stopped publishing her 15-year-old weekly research studies in October and a month later left UBS to join boutique Austin, Texas-based firm Amherst Holdings as its research head.

As this story illustrates, problems at times are “Silenced,” which I refer to as Icebox Silent Problems.  These problems are being managed and controlled, which makes them extremely difficult to dislodge. From my perspective, this New York Post article is analagous to previous stories related to Enron, Worldcomm and others. The analysts that were screaming “Wolf” should have had their voices heard and heeded.  Instead, they were silenced.  The financial impact to you and me from this silence is staggering.

Note.  The book provides a process for getting your word out, when the individuals above you are holding you down.

Compensation at a Crossroads Part 2

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

The role for incentive programs in the development of a total compensation plan is generally accepted as a sound business practice.  The more heavily weighted the incentive plan, the more likely the top talent will deliver the desired results.  At least this is the generally accepted thinking. In the February 23rd blog of the same title, I stated.

The reasons for incentive plans are logical, and difficult to argue against.  After all, you want your employees to be focused and do their best work.  However, creating an incentive strategy that drives results without being blindsided years later can be challenging.  After all, we’ve all seen incentive plans go bad, which are really Silent Problems, just waiting to happen.

It now appears that corporate boards are beginning to rethink incentive plan programs.  Yesterday, Bloomberg reported that Bank of America may increase salaries for investment bankers.  It stated, “The concepts we are considering would not increase total compensation,” Brian Moynihan, Bank of America’s president of investment banking and wealth management, wrote yesterday in a memo to employees obtained by Bloomberg News. “Rather, we believe it is responsible, and consistent with the emerging public consensus, that a greater percentage of overall compensation come from fixed base salary… In view of the public concerns about executive compensation, changes in the market, and the need to create a more sustainable compensation culture, all the major financial institutions are evaluating compensation practices,”

Personally, I believe this is just the tip of the iceberg on this subject. Incentive plans are designed to retain top talent. The unfortunate part, once a plan is in place, individuals will align with the plan, not necessarily the values or the long-term objectives of the organization.  This is a topic that will remain in the spotlight.

Numbers Don’t Lie?

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

An important component of every business is commonly thought to lie in the details. For many, this means - the numbers. Today, we find it important to rationalize everything in mathematical, scientific and linear terms. Society constructed this security blanket, thinking the scientific mind would protect us. So I conducted a quick Internet search with the words, “Numbers don’t lie, but.” Here are some of the gems I found.

*Numbers don’t lie, but… From whence do my figures come?
*Numbers don’t lie, but they don’t always reveal the truth.
*Numbers don’t lie. But when it comes to Internet rankings, they may not tell the whole truth.
*Numbers Don’t Lie, But They Certainly Can Mislead!
*Numbers don’t lie, but they don’t volunteer anything either.
*The numbers don’t lie, but they do conceal part of the truth.
*Everyone knows that numbers don’t lie. But interpretations of numbers? Now that’s a different matter.
*Numbers don’t lie, but liars manipulate numbers.
*As the saying goes, numbers don’t lie but you can use them to tell just about any story you want.
*As a compromise, maybe its true that the numbers don’t lie,but the words people use to describe the numbers do.
*There is the old adage that numbers don’t lie, but what if you are looking at the wrong numbers?
*Numbers don’t lie, but what is inferred from them is almost always a distortion.
*It’s often said that “Numbers don’t lie”, but in this case the numbers do lie.
*Numbers don’t lie but they sure can tell a good story.

Yes, there is a false sense of security in numbers. Do I need to mention Madoff, Stratford . . .

Risk is attached to far ranging elements from poor communication, to numbers that lie, to poor discision making…  Unfortunately, each is a silent problem with their own set of rules and peculiarities.  Beware…

Another Silent Problem Exposed

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

In this economic recession, it seems like every day another story surfaces where another silent problem is exposed, and without warning.  These events place individuals, businesses and their livelihoods at stake.  Today a story surfaced over at Bloomberg about KIKO currency trading options ( knock-in/knock-out, or KIKO, options) that are popular in South Korea and around the globe.  The story states:

Growth skidded to a halt in mid-2008 — and not because orders dried up. Along with the rest of the Korean economy, Kumkang had been on a roll amid surging exports. The company’s crash came after the fallout from currency contracts that Choi signed with banks and now says he didn’t understand. In September, Kumkang filed for bankruptcy because of changing exchange rates and terms of the deals. In November, one bank closed the last of Choi’s contracts, costing him $15 million, half of his annual revenue last year.

A common denominator amongst these Without Warning stories is “Risk.”  In this story, a business leader was attempting to control risk, yet in reality he was being exposed to an even greater risk.  And just as few people saw the subprime crisis coming, it appears that noone foresaw the Korean won depreciating by 33% against the dollar.  Suddenly the risk they were attempting to control came with it an even greater risk, which they didn’t expect.  According to the article, 50,000 businesses around the globe are in a similar predicament. 

As economies claw their way out of this recession, discussions around Risk will be at the center of every organization.

Is the Recession Waning?

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

Over the weekend, I read numerous magazines and newspapers and was struck with how a unified tone is taking hold.  This being, the bad news from leading economic indicators ,to declining employment is a component of every news story.  A year ago, despite the humpty dumpty fall of Bear Stearns, the reported economic outlook was still optimistic.  Obviously, this was just before the big falls of AIG, Lehman Brothers and others.  Now the news has moved to the other extreme, yet the market is acting as if a recovery is underway. Is it?

On March 3rd I listened to Alan Beaulieu of Trend Research.  Alan and his team predicted this recession a couple of years ago, anticipated the impact of the subprime 18 months ago and six months ago noted this would be a worldwide recession.  Well 3 weeks ago he noted that they were seeing some early signals indicating a recovery might be underway.  Although more bad news will emerge in coming weeks and months (which the news will focus on), my thoughts are that a recovery is underway.  What is my rational?

  1. Companies with strong balance sheets are looking at opportunities to acquire undervalued assets.  Companies as far reaching as Cisco to Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway group are stepping up to the plate.  This will begin to shore up stock prices and economic sentiment.
  2. Economic recessions are a catalyst for entrepreneurism.  The formation of new businesses out of this recession is underway, and may be more pronounced than in recent recessions.
  3. The public outcry over bonuses at AIG and others suggests that people are moving from fear to anger - anger can become a transformational tipping point in a recession.
  4. Inventories over the past 6-months have declined with the market, and it won’t take much upward movement in new demand to make a sustainable impact.
  5. The talent scarcity of 12-months ago has mostly evaporated.  Companies can rebuild their organizations with good talent at a reasonable cost.

Obviously, numerous toxic elements still overhang this marketplace, which will mute any rebound.  However just as the recession hit many Without Warning, so too will its rebound.

Is Obama being Irrationally Rational

Saturday, March 21st, 2009

I was listening to the radio this morning and heard a story of a town hall meeting in California that President Obama participated in.  The take away from the report.  Amongst all of the furor over AIG bonuses in recent days, the question was never raised.  The conclusion, people were more concerned about the bigger picture relative to the state of the economy, and the AIG bonus story wasn’t all that important.

While I respect the President’s decision, I’m concerned he’s  being irrationally rational. In the book Without Warning, it discusses how problems become silent.  One of the paths to problem silence is that given enougn time, it will just fade away. However, we must realize that what occurred at AIG is likely part of a bigger problem, and similar stories will continue to surface until the system is fixed. 

And here’s my recommendation to the President.  Beware of the Silent Problems that are lurking around the corner.  Just because you can’t see or hear them, doesn’t mean they don’t exist.  And if they aren’t dealt with proactively, they will impact you reactively.

AIG & Stalin

Friday, March 20th, 2009

AIG, the giant insurance company that received $180 billion of bailout funds to date, has been front and center news with the announcement that derivative traders and executives were receiving $165 million in bonuses (it’s important to note that this represents less than 0.1% of bailout funds received).  “For what” the public asked.  Obviously, the public wants to know. 

An equally rampant discussion continues to unfold in the online community, asking the same question.  One of the more contrarian views surfaced from The True North Leadership Blog by Bill George and Joe Chung.  They position AIG’s CEO Edward Liddy as a great leader taking the fall.  They make some great points in that Liddy came out of retirement 6-months ago to help his country, taking over an important business that had been grossly mismanaged for a mere $1 per year.  At the other end of the spectrum comes Tom Peters and his blog post titled AIG & Me.  Peters states, “The stupidity of AIG leadership boggles the mind… it seemed to border on certifiable insanity.” 

Here’s my perspective and I’m going to quote from Joseph Stalin, the former dictator of Russia.  Stolin stated, “A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic.”  Or in AIG speak, $165 million is a tragedy, $180 billion is a statistic.

From my perspective, the AIG story may be the story that breaks the camel’s back.  People are now certifiably angry, and they want action.  No matter what Washington does, they aren’t the answer - they’re only a conduit.  Over the past 6 months, many people have lived in a state of fear.  Today, they’re moving from fear to anger, and that’s good.  This is a point where fresh energy enters the arena and big problems can be tackled.  I just hope that we keep it up, because it will be good for us as individuals and our country.

Let’s get angry and keep moving forward!

Learn to Spot a Corporate Disaster

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

In yesterday’s post, I inserted a link to a CNBC interview with Nouriel Roubini and Nassim Nicholas Taleb.  Today, there is an interesting article over at the FOREX website, titled Learn How to Spot a Disater.  It discusses where to look to determine whether a company might be experiencing a financial disaster - its a great list including cash flow, debt level, price declines, resignations and others.  If you’re interested in this stuff, its worth the read.

On a related note, I believe there is a bigger story at play here.  The marketplace along with the investor is becoming much more diligent and vocal relative to the financial stress the economy is in.  Individuals that were respected for their investing strategies of a year ago have lost favor, after all, almost anyone can look good during an extended bull market.  Now a new era of global thinkers are emerging, and this group doesn’t have the cozy relationship with the investment community, and they’ll be more willing to cry wolf, Without Warning.  It will be interesting to watch the changing of the guard on Wall Street and how this impacts future earning potential at the major investment houses.

Dr. Doom & The Black Swan

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

 

There are possibly two individuals that understand the Without Warning event that hit the financial district of Manhattan and the signs that were missed better than anyone else, Nouriel Roubini and Nassim Nicholas Taleb.  Today each of these men are rock stars and the amount of coverage and notoriety they’re receiving is immense, and people are starting to listen.  Of course, I believe almost anyone is eager to listen to someone other than a government official or someone that is receiving bailout money. 

What interests me about Roubini and Taleb is that they understand the toxic effects of Silent Problems that reside in organizations, governments and society.  I think you’ll find this CNBC interview intriguing.

You can see the film here - Dr Doom & The Black Swan

Be the one to see it coming!

The first leadership book to point out the problem, then hand-deliver the solution.

Without Warning - Rondey Johnson

Learn More

Order Info