Skip to content

Archive for the ‘Biofuels’ Category

Ethanol - A Challenged Industry

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

 I’ve written about the challenges of the ethanol/biofuels industry many times. And the bad news just keeps coming, Without Warning. Each piece of news is challenging the future viability of the industry. For instance, in recent weeks several reports have surfaced.

From AgriNews, April 24, 2009 (AP Story): “Antibiotics pose concern for ethanol corn producers.”  The primary byproduct of corn ethanol is a feed ingredient called Distillers Dried Grains, or DDGS. The story states, Ethananol production relies on enzymes, yeast and sugar to convert corn into fuel. And just as the wrong bacteria in thebody can sicken people, it also can cause a variety of ailments in a batch of ethanol… the main enemy is a bacterial bug that makes lactic acid… if enough of the bacteria is present, fermentation can be ruined… If that happens, there’s no ethanol and no profit… what these people operating these plants are trying to do is to keep these lactic acid bacteria in check. And one way of doing that is with the help of antibiotics… penicillin and virgniamycin… The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has taken a mostly hands off approach to the use of antibiotics in the ethanol industry. But amid increasing concerns over food safety in recent years, the agency is taking a closer look… Charlie Staff, executive director of the Distillers Grains Technology Council, said that distillers grain is one of the few dependable money makers for the ethanol industry. If they didn’t have distillers grains as a revenue, many more of the them (ethanol plants) would be able to operate.

From AgriMarketing, April, 29, 2009: “Iowa State Professor Issues New Report: Status update on the Ethanol Industry.” It states: According to Ethanol Producer Magazine, the current count is that 37 ethanol distilleries are out of business — with 23 of them built since 2005. The cumulative production capacity of these plants is 2.2 billion gallons annually. Given that there are presently 193 ethanol distilleries in the U.S. (according to the Renewable Fuels Association) 37 idled plants represents 19.2 percent of all distilleries, and 17.8 percent of production capacity. That’s right on pace with our prediction that a substantial percentage of plants will be out of business within the next five years.

Why? It’s basic economics. Even with the vast amount of taxpayer subsidization of the industry, ethanol remains more expensive than gasoline on an energy basis — per British Thermal Unit (Btu). Ethanol simply contains less heat energy that the same amount of gasoline does. So, its real cost to buyers is more than gasoline. Sure, it costs less at the pumps in most locations across the country, but the discount is not enough to offset ethanol’s lower energy content which results in less fuel economy. Not even the taxpayer largesse that continues to be poured into the industry can stop the problems.

From “The Economist,” April 11, 2009, “Biofools, Farming biofuels produces nitrous oxide.” This is bad for the environment. Theory, though, does not always translate into practice, and just as governments have committed to the greater use of biofuels, questions are being raised about how greeen this form of energy really is. The latest come from a report produced by a team of scientists working on behalf of the International Council for Science (ICSU), a Paris based federation of scientific associations from around the world. The ICSU report concludes that so far the productions of biofuelds has aggravated rather than ameliorated global warming.

Add these additional challenges to the mix:

1. Carbon Footprint:California is in the midst of creating legislation that could eliminate the use ofethanol derived from corn due to its “Carbon Footprint.” Here is the link to a short article that discusses the controversial nature of this legislation. Is ethanol’s carbon footprint bad? It depends

2. Water Usage: Concerns are being raised about the amount of water it takes to produce a gallon of corn based ethanol, especially if the corn was raised utilizing irrigation. Here is an excellent article over at MIT Technology Review: Measuring Corn Ethanol’s Thirst for Water.

Add these pieces together and what do you get. You get a Silent Problem that is being avoided, neglected and silenced on many fronts. No matter what the pro-biofuel folks are stating to the contrary, the biofuels industry is in trouble. And its viability is growing more tenuous by the day. It could easily be another “Without Warning Event.”

BioFuels - An Industry Under Attack

Sunday, April 12th, 2009

I grew up on a farm. I went to ag school and received an agribusiness degree. I’ve spent much of my career in positions related to agriculture. My parents now in their 80s still farm. Yes, agriculture has been good to me. This is only to state, I’ve followed agriculture as much out of curiosity as heritage. Therefore, you might find my critical view of the biofuels marketplace misplaced. So be it. In recent weeks I’ve noticed that the corral around the biofuels industry is getting a little smaller and a little tighter. This is in contrast to 5-years ago when everything biofuels was the rage. For instance, in recent weeks pork producers announced that their industry has lost $3.0-3.5 billion dollars due to increased costs of feed inputs due to ethanol production .  The grocery trade association continues to weigh in that subsidizing ethanol is bad policy. Various scientific and environmentalist groups are giving the thmbs down to maize based ethanol. 

In recent years, the biofuels industry has made significant strides in improving the economics of producing ethanol. Conversion rates are up and water consumption to produce a gallon of ethanol - down. And for the time being, Washington DC and President Obama appear to be on board with maintaining the current subsidy program. Yet despite this, the biofuels industry is in tough financial shape. Various ethanol entities, some corporate and some cooperatives, are facing dire financial operating performance. Many projects have been mothballed and numerous facilities are in bankruptcy. Yes, $50 a barrel oil is tough competition.

What does all of this mean?

First, ethanol has run a parallel life to home ownership and the mortgage industry. For all intents and purposes, the ethanol industry resembles that of a bubble industry. Two, investors willing to reinvest in this industry have dried up, and are unlikely to return anytime soon. Third,ethanol will likely find reduced consumer acceptance if additional bad news enters the marketplace. Yes, I believe the ethanol/biofuels industry is fighting for survival, and may be one they may not win. Only time will tell.

A Looming Biofuels Bust

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

On February 23rd, I wrote in this column, titled A Few Good Men, about former military general Wesley Clark and how he was named co-chairman of Growth Energy, a new biofuels group/association.  I stated they have four  primary objectives, which Clark would be directly focused on delivering against.  They were:

  1. Help move the blending cap from the current 10%, to 15-20%
  2. Increase the perceived importance of ethanol as a part of national and energy security
  3. Maintain the current subsidy program in place, which is due for renewal
  4. Position the industry as one that should not be allowed to fail

Today, I believe the importance of delivering on point #1 is quickly diminishing and the importance of numbers 2,3 and 4 are increasing.  If you were to follow the biofuels marketplace, you’d realize that biofuel plants are shutting down at an alarming rate.  The reason being, they simply aren’t profitable in today’s marketplace.  Crude oil is too low and their feedstock (mostly corn or soybeans) too high.  With many of these facilities either shutting their doors or considering this alternative, a shortage of ethanol could quickly emerge.  In turn, remaining production sites would be unable to meet the ethanol inclusion mandates in place.  The shortfall would be met by lowering the standard (by offering exceptions) or start importing ethanol (most likely source, Brazil). 

So as I iterated in my initial post, Growth Energy will be marching up to Capitol Hill, demanding their fair share of stimulus dollars. This industry is no longer focused on growth, but rather survival. At least that’s the way I see it.

A Few Good Men

Monday, February 23rd, 2009

Wesley Clark, retired general, former presidential candidate and touted as a possible vice presidential running mate for President Barack Obama was recently named co-chairman of Growth Energy which is described as “a new, proactive group committed to the promise of agriculture and growing America’s economy through cleaner, greener energy.”   On the surface, I found it interesting that an agribusiness association would choose a retired general as their figurehead.  Most of the time, generals find their next career in military related industries.  What gives?

In recent months, the financial health of the once fast growing ethanol industry has been challenged.  For instance, the second largest ethanol producer Verasun is in bankruptcy proceedings, and several others are operating in the red.  To makes matters worse, the industry is quickly approaching the ethanol saturation point at the current 10% gasoline blending cap.  One of the recent stated goals of Growth Energy is to increase the blending cap to 15-20%.

Obviously, Wesly Clark was offered this new, high profile position for numerous reasons, such as his credentials and his ties to the legislative body.  His marching orders are simple. 

  1. Help move the blending cap from the current 10%, to 15-20%
  2. Increase the perceived importance of ethanol as a part of national and energy security
  3. Maintain the current subsidy program in place, which is due for renewal
  4. Position the industry as one that should not be allowed to fail

These are tall orders coming from an industry that could be desperate.  Does Clark have the influence and stature to make it happen?  If you’re an investor in the ethanol industry, you can see the desperate hole you’re in - you have to do something.  But I’m wondering if Clark can make a difference.  From my perspective, he can only maintain the status quo at this point.  Is Clark’s position one of offense, but rather one of defense.  Time will tell.

Be the one to see it coming!

The first leadership book to point out the problem, then hand-deliver the solution.

Without Warning - Rondey Johnson

Learn More

Order Info