Skip to content

Posts Tagged ‘Akio Toyoda’

What Will You Be Remembered For?

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Over the next 2 years, what do you believe you and your organization will be remembered for? Will you be remembered for the great customer service you deliver on a day-to-day basis? Maybe, but doubtful. Will you be remembered for a new product you delivered into the marketplace with great fanfare? Possibly. Will you be remembered for the 50 years you’ve been in business, despite enormous odds? Unlikely. Or, will you be remembered for how you handled a disaster? The odds are, it will be the latter.

I’ve told clients many times, “Your leadership/organization will be recognized more by how it handles disaster, than by how it managed success.” Does this resonate with you? It should, because every once in a while we encounter one of those defining “disaster” moments. Or what some might refer to as “A Moment of Truth” situation.

Several years ago I was working with a client with a Moment of Truth situation. They had experienced an unexpectant product failure. At first glance, they were looking for straws. What went wrong? When did it start to occur? How many clients does it potentially impact? And the most important question of all, “What should we do?” They took enormous steps to identify the problem, and more importantly, implement a sound solution. They didn’t take the easy way out, or the low cost way out. They took the path that was best for their clients, because this aligned with their corporate values. The fix was costly and the outcome was interesting. Their client loyalty did not suffer, it actually improved!!!

There are numerous high profile scenarios with similar outcomes. The most obvious being, the Tylenol scare back in the 80s. And being from Minnesota, the collapse and the rebuilding of the I35W bridge. These are stories where adversity was embraced and sound solutions to difficult problems implemented.

Unfortunately, too often companies and their leaders follow a “path of least resistance or cost” protocol. It in many respects is tactical, not strategic. It’s about how companies can still achieve their objectives and not get sidetracked along the way.

Such is the case of Toyota. They embraced and fostered silent problems (problems that were being avoided, neglected, going unnoticed or being intentionally silenced), and are now suffering the outcomes. Toyota’s President, Akio Toyoda has proclaimed repeatedly that the fix they are proceeding with has been tested and has assured customers, “this will fix any problems that could be associated with unintended acceleration.” Today, Toyota’s that have received the fix are still experiencing unintended acceleration.

Today I’m wondering, will Akio Toyoda be known for how he mishandled a disaster, and the crumbles that are yet to come.

Probability

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Let’s assume I offered to sell you a house in an area known for its street crime. And to assure you that it was a good deal, I informed you that the probability is slim that you will have any problems. Would you buy the house? Probably not. Why? Because there are some risks you simply want to avoid.

If I was attempting to sell you a car and told you, “there is a slim probability that you might experience uncontrollable acceleration” - would you buy it? Probably not.  Because you likely enjoy life, and want to feel safe in your car. But what if you already own the car and find out that there is a slim probability that you might experience uncontrollable acceleration - does this make you feel better?

Well in the congressional panel yesterday, Jim Lentz, Toyota’s top U.S. sales executive essentially told Toyota owners to feel good about their Toyota investment because there was only a slim probability that you might experience uncontrollable acceleration. Jim Lentz, stated that Toyota plans to install an electronic program that allows the brake to override the throttle on some vehicles. And for those that don’t qualify,Lentz stated, ”the probability is slim” that they would have any problems. Furthermore, Lentz inferred that electronics could still be at the root of some unintended acceleration problems.

Toyota has a huge credibility and trust challenge going forward. Everyday, Toyota is making things worse and they can’t figure out how to overcome it. When Mr. Lentz was asked why Toyota had moved away from a business model that prized quality and openness, he offered a simple explanation: “We lost sight of our customers.”

And maybe this is the simple and heart wrenching challenge facing many companies today. “We simply lost sight of our customers.”

The answer going forward is simple Mr Lentz, isn’t it?

Safety, Quality & Transparency

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Mr. Akio Toyoda, President of the Toyota Motor Company has been embroiled in controversy and fingerpointing for several months now. Today he sits in front of a U.S. Congressional hearing to defend his company and protect its future. As a prelim to this event, Mr. Toyoda had an Op-Ed piece published in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, titled Back to Basics for Toyota - it’s worth reading. If you’ve read my blog before and its numerous articles, its worth delving into Mr. Toyota’s position.

Mr. Toyoda’s Op-Ed piece is telling, because it gives us a peek into what he is thinking, and how Toyota will attempt to reinvent itself going forward. Therefore, I went through the article and did a simple word count for the words Safety, Quality and Transparency. This is what I found.

Safety: 10 times
Quality: 6 times
Transparency: 2 times

From this, it’s apparent that Safety is what is on the mind of Toyota’s customers and repairing the safety issue is “Job 1.” And the way to solving the safety issue (rebuilding trust) is through quality, which has historically been a core strength of Toyota. However the means to addressing the safety issue is by creating a culture of transparency. This is the feedback loop that enables Toyota’s engineers to design safer systems. Yet transparency is only listed twice. They are:

1st mention - 2nd paragraph: The first step is taking care of vehicles on the road today. But it also means making even safer vehicles in the future—and being more open and transparent about any safety issues that arise.

2nd mention - next to last paragraph: In short, I pledge that Toyota will set a new standard for transparency and speed of response on safety issues. 

This Op-Ed piece focuses on safety and quality, and only touches on the issue of transparency. Yet as recent reports have implicated, its the transparency issue that is at the heart of the Toyota Safety and Quality problem. And the lack of transparency is directly tied to the Japanese culture, which it doesn’t address. How will Mr. Toyoda create a culture of transparency? What does this mean? What systems will be put in place? Without a culture of transparency, it suggests that Toyota is ripe for silent problems (problems that are being avoided, neglected, go about unnoticed or are being intentionally silenced) into the future.

Bottom Line: Toyota needs to implement processes and procedures to deal with the silent problems inside the Toyota organization. It’s interesting, they have the system in place in their manufacturing plants today, and is core to their historical strength in quality and safety. Now they need to implement a similar process inside the management and leadership ranks at Toyota. And as I noted in my book, silent problems can be the most destructive problems of all. 

What do you think? Can Akio Toyoda do better?

 

Toyota’s Silent Problem Crisis

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

The opening paragraph in the Wall Street Journal captures the essence of Toyota’s problems, but more importantly Toyota’s silent problems. The article A Crisis Made in Japan by Jeff Kingston, director of Asian Studies at Temple University states,

In Japan there is a proverb, “If it stinks, put a lid on it.” Alas, this seems to have been Toyota’s approach to its burgeoning safety crisis, initially denying, minimizing and mitigating the problems involving brakes that don’t brake and accelerators that have a mind of their own. President Akio Toyoda, grandson of the founder, was MIA for two weeks and the company has appeared less than forthcoming about critical safety issues, risking the trust of its customers world-wide.

The article further states: It is not surprising that Toyota’s response has been dilatory and inept, because crisis management in Japan is grossly undeveloped. Over the past two decades, I cannot think of one instance where a Japanese company has done a good job managing a crisis. The pattern is all too familiar, typically involving slow initial response, minimizing the problem, foot dragging on the product recall, poor communication with the public about the problem and too little compassion and concern for consumers adversely affected by the product. Whether it’s exploding televisions, fire-prone appliances, tainted milk or false labeling, in case after case companies have shortchanged their customers by shirking responsibility until the accumulated evidence forces belated disclosure and recognition of culpability.

Japanese firms often seek to cover up or fudge the facts and the people communicating with the media and public often do not have the information they need to do their job. The absence of a structure to quickly get accurate information to top management hampers an accurate and adequate response. That leaves management unprepared to deal with media questioning and conveys an image of stonewalling and indifference.

This article by Jeff Kingston is a must-read if you want to get your arms around how Toyota’s crisis started, how it grew, and eventually how it exploded. It also points to why Toyota’s problem might be far from over and why its aftermath may continue to linger into the future. In my book, Without Warning, I write, There is little doubt that participating in and winning in a world that is connected, mobile and increasingly transparent can be challenging, creating a multitude of problems for political and business leaders alike, and their organizations. The problems one is expected to solve arrive with risks attached. The potential for faulure is real. At times, the opportunity for a happily ever after ending appears remote at best. Yet this is the sandbox where most political and business leaders play, and at times are asked to leave. It’s also this same sandbox where many followers find themselves, contemplating whether to follow their leaders in the games they play or to pursue a different path, one they believe they can truly make a difference.

Toyota’s problems are real, and everyone must ask, “Are there more surprises in the grass?”  Time will tell.

Be the one to see it coming!

The first leadership book to point out the problem, then hand-deliver the solution.

Without Warning - Rondey Johnson

Learn More

Order Info