Skip to content

Posts Tagged ‘Quality’

Toyota’s Ongoing Problems

Monday, June 28th, 2010

By now, most analysts thought Toyota’s problems would be behind them, and nothing but open road in front. This is not the case, as many challenges continue to face the once mighty, Toyota. As I’ve discussed in previous blogs, Toyota’s silent problems are an endemic challenge they would face and one that would not go away easily. Therefore, it’s not surprising that fresh recalls are occuring, including the recent recall of 17,000 Lexus sedans with a fuel problem. Two, Toyota’s stock price is now at its lowest level in over a year. And in recent weeks, I’ve noticed an uptick in news reports where crashes involving Toyotas’ (outside the recall spectrum)  with unintended acceleration problems occurring. Plus, none of this even begins to address the multitude of legal challenges now on their plate. To say the least, Toyota is a company with many challenges, and an unpredictable future.

What is the reason for Toyota’s ongoing problems? On March 17  I addressed this issue head-on, and is worth repeating:

Today, cost estimates for Toyota’s silent problems are ranging from $2 Billion on the low side, to $5.5 Billion on the top side. My research suggests a factor of 2X to 4X is reasonable from these numbers, because none of these estimates factor in elements such as:

  • Reduced organizational focus
  • A shift from strategic to tactical activity
  • Negative impact on team and individual performance
  • Negative impact on accountability
  • Negative impact on innovation…

These factors and others can break a high performance organization. They can increase employee turnover. They can impact financial and organizational performance for years to come. This is why betting on Toyota’s return to dominance is such a risky bet. Simply because we don’t fully understand the full impact on Toyota. However if history proves itself, this event will impact Toyota many years. Just ask GM,Ford and others…

Today, Toyota is facing increasing competition from companies like Ford & GM, Hyundai & Kia, and of course VW, Audi, BMW and others. Each of these have picked up their game in recent years and are willing to take Toyota head-on. However what is killing Toyota slowly and quietly is not competion. To the contrary, Toyota’s brand and reputation have eroded in areas where it was prviously strong like quality, engineering, dependibility, value and safety. In essence, very few proudly state, “I drive a Toyota” today. From my perspective, Toyota will continue to be a company in turmoil, with an eroding value proposition.

Probability

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Let’s assume I offered to sell you a house in an area known for its street crime. And to assure you that it was a good deal, I informed you that the probability is slim that you will have any problems. Would you buy the house? Probably not. Why? Because there are some risks you simply want to avoid.

If I was attempting to sell you a car and told you, “there is a slim probability that you might experience uncontrollable acceleration” - would you buy it? Probably not.  Because you likely enjoy life, and want to feel safe in your car. But what if you already own the car and find out that there is a slim probability that you might experience uncontrollable acceleration - does this make you feel better?

Well in the congressional panel yesterday, Jim Lentz, Toyota’s top U.S. sales executive essentially told Toyota owners to feel good about their Toyota investment because there was only a slim probability that you might experience uncontrollable acceleration. Jim Lentz, stated that Toyota plans to install an electronic program that allows the brake to override the throttle on some vehicles. And for those that don’t qualify,Lentz stated, ”the probability is slim” that they would have any problems. Furthermore, Lentz inferred that electronics could still be at the root of some unintended acceleration problems.

Toyota has a huge credibility and trust challenge going forward. Everyday, Toyota is making things worse and they can’t figure out how to overcome it. When Mr. Lentz was asked why Toyota had moved away from a business model that prized quality and openness, he offered a simple explanation: “We lost sight of our customers.”

And maybe this is the simple and heart wrenching challenge facing many companies today. “We simply lost sight of our customers.”

The answer going forward is simple Mr Lentz, isn’t it?

Safety, Quality & Transparency

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Mr. Akio Toyoda, President of the Toyota Motor Company has been embroiled in controversy and fingerpointing for several months now. Today he sits in front of a U.S. Congressional hearing to defend his company and protect its future. As a prelim to this event, Mr. Toyoda had an Op-Ed piece published in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, titled Back to Basics for Toyota - it’s worth reading. If you’ve read my blog before and its numerous articles, its worth delving into Mr. Toyota’s position.

Mr. Toyoda’s Op-Ed piece is telling, because it gives us a peek into what he is thinking, and how Toyota will attempt to reinvent itself going forward. Therefore, I went through the article and did a simple word count for the words Safety, Quality and Transparency. This is what I found.

Safety: 10 times
Quality: 6 times
Transparency: 2 times

From this, it’s apparent that Safety is what is on the mind of Toyota’s customers and repairing the safety issue is “Job 1.” And the way to solving the safety issue (rebuilding trust) is through quality, which has historically been a core strength of Toyota. However the means to addressing the safety issue is by creating a culture of transparency. This is the feedback loop that enables Toyota’s engineers to design safer systems. Yet transparency is only listed twice. They are:

1st mention - 2nd paragraph: The first step is taking care of vehicles on the road today. But it also means making even safer vehicles in the future—and being more open and transparent about any safety issues that arise.

2nd mention - next to last paragraph: In short, I pledge that Toyota will set a new standard for transparency and speed of response on safety issues. 

This Op-Ed piece focuses on safety and quality, and only touches on the issue of transparency. Yet as recent reports have implicated, its the transparency issue that is at the heart of the Toyota Safety and Quality problem. And the lack of transparency is directly tied to the Japanese culture, which it doesn’t address. How will Mr. Toyoda create a culture of transparency? What does this mean? What systems will be put in place? Without a culture of transparency, it suggests that Toyota is ripe for silent problems (problems that are being avoided, neglected, go about unnoticed or are being intentionally silenced) into the future.

Bottom Line: Toyota needs to implement processes and procedures to deal with the silent problems inside the Toyota organization. It’s interesting, they have the system in place in their manufacturing plants today, and is core to their historical strength in quality and safety. Now they need to implement a similar process inside the management and leadership ranks at Toyota. And as I noted in my book, silent problems can be the most destructive problems of all. 

What do you think? Can Akio Toyoda do better?

 

Silent Problem Inside China

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

In my book Without Warning, I refer to ISMs as a place where manysilent problems reside. In this classification, ISMs related to gender, race, generation and culture exist.  The challenge for the ISM category relates to how difficult they can be to dislodge. In effect, they’re engrained inside the organization, the culture, the society. And since they’re engrained, they’re difficult to dislodge.

Recently I was reading “The Economist” and came across the book review “Poorly Made In China” by Paul Midler. It states:

Factories will do anything to please. Prices are famously low and production cycles short. His clients returned from their initial trips to China stunned by how quickly factories became proficient and puzzled by how much could be done so well, so fast, so cheaply. They were right to wonder.

Most of Mr Midler’s work is coping with what he calls “quality fade” as the Chinese factories transform what were, in fact, profitless contracts into lucrative relationships. The production cycle he sees is the opposite of the theoretical model of continuous improvement. After resolving teething problems and making products that match specifications, innovation inside the factory turns to cutting costs, often in ways that range from unsavoury to dangerous. Packaging is cheapened, chemical formulations altered, sanitary standards curtailed, and on and on, in a series of continual product debasements.

The first line of defence against compromised products are the factory’s clients, the importers. The moment they begin suspecting a Chinese manufacturing “partner” and want to discover what might be unfolding is the moment they become particularly eager to find people in China like Mr Midler. That suggests they want information. But, as Mr Midler discovers, they are finicky about what is found. When suspicions turn out to be reality, all too often they become unhappy—miserable about resolving something costly and disruptive, yet terrified about being complicit in peddling a dangerous product. This is particularly true if the problems could go undetected by customers. Better, to some extent, not to know.

It’s the last paragraph that spells out the Silent Problem phenomenon and the “why we avoid” stigma. A place where problems reside unsolved and often times, morphing into a new and higher form. When they’re unleashed, they’re commonly toxic. So if you’ve been following “Made in China” news in recent years, you’re likely not surprised that China has strong cultural underpinnings. After all, its a culture steeped in history dating back thousands of years. Yet I find it surprising that many companies look at the cost side of the ledger, while avoiding the risk side. To avoid a Without Warning event such as lead tainted paint in toys, companies must look at both sides of the equation. Risk & Reward. Unfortunately, many companies are just now beginning to understand the risks.

Although I have yet to read Poorly Made in China, this excerpt adds context to this important subject. And if the quality drift is cultural in scope, changing it will be difficult for companies to a achieve.

Be the one to see it coming!

The first leadership book to point out the problem, then hand-deliver the solution.

Without Warning - Rondey Johnson

Learn More

Order Info