Skip to content

Posts Tagged ‘Toyota’s crisis’

Toyota, we’re watching you…

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

What a difference 6-months can make in corporate positioning when someone knows everyone is watching you. Such appears to be the case surrounding Toyota. Six months ago, Toyota took a position of denial, avoidance and stonewalling when it came to quality issues relating to unintended acceleration. Since then, 8.5 million autos have been recalled. Toyota sales are being catapulted with hefty incentives that were unheard of a year ago. And Toyota is beginning to show some humility over the sitation.

What isn’t pretty however is the ongoing investigation into Toyota’s past. Now that the 100+ lawsuits have been rolled up into a single class action suit, much of Toyota’s dirty laundry will begin to surface. And from initial reports, a story that reveals a veil of secrecy and deception will unfold. For instance, the AP recently looked into Toyota’s evasive and deceptive legal tactics it has historically pursued when involved in a lawsuit.  The story states:

Toyota has routinely engaged in questionable, evasive and deceptive legal tactics when sued, frequently claiming it does not have information it is required to turn over and sometimes even ignoring court orders to produce key documents, an Associated Press investigation shows.

In a review of lawsuits filed around the country involving a wide range of complaints — not just the sudden acceleration problems that have led to millions of Toyotas being recalled — the automaker has hidden the existence of tests that would be harmful to its legal position and claimed key material was difficult to get at its headquarters in Japan. It has withheld potentially damaging documents and refused to release data stored electronically in its vehicles.

However today, I’m begining to wonder if Toyota is truly ready to change its ways. The reason being, Toyota knows everyone is watching. And if they pursue questionable legal tactics, they know they could be called out on the carpet in every major news agency around the world. In essence, Toyota’s past is now their enemy, not their friend. No longer will they receive any “get out of jail cards.” Today, I believe everyone looks at Toyota with an eye of admoration and an eye questioning their trustworthiness. For instance yesterday, Toyota had one of those “what should we do moments.” Toyota halted sales of its Lexus GX460 after Consumer Reports issued a “Don’t Buy” status on the vehicle. Would Toyota have acted similarly a year ago in a similar sitation? My guess is, the outcome would have much different. So I have to believe that Toyota’s strategy is changing as we speak.

Today, Toyota’s Silent Problems of yesterday (the problems Toyota has been avoiding, neglecting and intentionally silencing) are exerting a tremendous force on the company and the organization. These legal and quality issues will continue to be a major distraction, and will impact everything from employee turnover, to productivity, to profitability. Toyota continues to be a test case for the ideas in unleashed in my book, Without Warning.

What Did Toyota Really Know?

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

The last couple of months has been painful for Toyota. Several large recalls have been initiated. Toyota executives have appeared in front of a several congressional hearings.  Sales and customer loyalty numbers are declining. And now news that unintended acceleration in cars that have been fixed have been reported. What else could possibly go wrong?

If you’re a business leader, it doesn’t get any more challenging than this. The ship has a gaping hole in its fuselage, you’re taking on water, and your future is unsure. Which leads me to the question, “What did Toyota know about their problemn and when.  Was it 6-months ago? 1 year ago? Possibly 6-years ago?

When you look back at history, the story eventually surfaces through an autobiography, a whistleblower lawsuit, or an internal leak. And when the truth finally surfaces, I expect the findings will be revealing. What might we learn?

  1. We might learn the how, the why and the where the problem started.
  2. We might learn who made the decision and who supported it.
  3. We might learn how Toyota was able to keep it silenced for so long.
  4. We might learn what they hoped to achieve by their decision, and what they feared if it leaked out.
  5. We might learn that they were unable and unwilling to take on such huge problem.

The “What Did Toyota Really Know and When” questions are the basis for the congressional hearings about Toyota’s safety problems. So far, these hearings have achieved little in answering this question. Although the Toyota problem is now visible, and the pressure is on to get to the bottom of it. Eventually we will learn the answer, and when this emerges, a certain war analogy will likely sum up the findings.

Every military defeat can be explained by two words - “too late.” Too late in anticipating danger - too late in preparing for it - too late in taking action.

What Will You Be Remembered For?

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Over the next 2 years, what do you believe you and your organization will be remembered for? Will you be remembered for the great customer service you deliver on a day-to-day basis? Maybe, but doubtful. Will you be remembered for a new product you delivered into the marketplace with great fanfare? Possibly. Will you be remembered for the 50 years you’ve been in business, despite enormous odds? Unlikely. Or, will you be remembered for how you handled a disaster? The odds are, it will be the latter.

I’ve told clients many times, “Your leadership/organization will be recognized more by how it handles disaster, than by how it managed success.” Does this resonate with you? It should, because every once in a while we encounter one of those defining “disaster” moments. Or what some might refer to as “A Moment of Truth” situation.

Several years ago I was working with a client with a Moment of Truth situation. They had experienced an unexpectant product failure. At first glance, they were looking for straws. What went wrong? When did it start to occur? How many clients does it potentially impact? And the most important question of all, “What should we do?” They took enormous steps to identify the problem, and more importantly, implement a sound solution. They didn’t take the easy way out, or the low cost way out. They took the path that was best for their clients, because this aligned with their corporate values. The fix was costly and the outcome was interesting. Their client loyalty did not suffer, it actually improved!!!

There are numerous high profile scenarios with similar outcomes. The most obvious being, the Tylenol scare back in the 80s. And being from Minnesota, the collapse and the rebuilding of the I35W bridge. These are stories where adversity was embraced and sound solutions to difficult problems implemented.

Unfortunately, too often companies and their leaders follow a “path of least resistance or cost” protocol. It in many respects is tactical, not strategic. It’s about how companies can still achieve their objectives and not get sidetracked along the way.

Such is the case of Toyota. They embraced and fostered silent problems (problems that were being avoided, neglected, going unnoticed or being intentionally silenced), and are now suffering the outcomes. Toyota’s President, Akio Toyoda has proclaimed repeatedly that the fix they are proceeding with has been tested and has assured customers, “this will fix any problems that could be associated with unintended acceleration.” Today, Toyota’s that have received the fix are still experiencing unintended acceleration.

Today I’m wondering, will Akio Toyoda be known for how he mishandled a disaster, and the crumbles that are yet to come.

Silent Problems Being Revealed

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

 Do you wish the Toyota story would finally come to an end? Do you wish that Toyota would simply get back to the business of making great cars? Do wish that Toyota would simply come clean, take care of their problems, and move on? As much as I want to say “Yes” to each of these questions, the likelihood of it happening appears to be miniscule. The magnitude of Toyota’s problems is simply too great.

Over the past month, Toyota’s drive to fix its problems is being challenged at every intersection as new allegations, new lawsuits, and fresh dirty laundry come into the open. And from what I’ve seen, it appears that the tsunami has more destruction in its path.  Because the problems that Toyota has evidently been hiding for years are now beginning to surface, and will be fodder for front page news around the globe for the foreseeable future. And this is where Toyota’s quality and safety image is taking it on the chin.

In a Bloomberg story, Toyota Recall Crisis Said To Lie In Cost Cuts, Growth Ambitions, the authors investigate the “What went wrong” side of the story. And from the story, it’s apparent that cost cutting and corporate profits were Job 1, not quality or safety. For instance the article states, The company also had been too fixated on achieving a goal, set by Watanabe, of raising its operating margin to 10 percent to keep profit growing, the person described Toyoda as saying… At a 2006 investor conference in London Watanabe and former Executive Vice President Kazuo Okamoto discussed plans to “exceed the cost-reduction results achieved in CCC21” by eliminating vehicle parts and pushing suppliers to adopt lighter, cheaper materials. While the programs brought development advances, they may have inadvertently triggered quality glitches, said current and former company officials who asked not to be named because the information isn’t public.

Over at the Washington Post, Lawmaker accuses Toyota of withholding evidence reveals Toyota’s secretive “Book of Knowledge.”

Toyota withheld documents it was legally required to turn over in liability lawsuits the company faced and it paid higher settlements to plaintiffs to avoid revealing information contained in Toyota’s secret “Books of Knowledge,” a congressional committee chairman said Friday.

As I’ve been following and blogging about this story for over a month now, there appears to be several sides to the Toyota story now emerging.

  1. The Why Story: Why did Toyota pursue a path that was built on a deck of cards. Didn’t they realize it would eventually crumble?
  2. The How Story: How did Toyota go from being a company that was respected, to one that is being questioned and challenged? How did a company whose founding principles of quality and safety become a company of average quality and mediocre safety?
  3. The Where Story: Where were the corporate secrets held? This story is just now being told - i.e. The Book of Knowledge . Where did all of the quality and safety issues actually go  - were they simply throw into a big black hole?
  4. The What Story: What can we anticipate will surface in the future? What will Toyota attempt to do to diffuse the story and regain its fleeing customer base?
  5. The Money Story: How big will the final bill be once all of the lawsuits, recalls and reduced value of the company and future earning potential be? My guess - its much bigger than most are willing to fathom - $50 Billion?

 The cost of Toyota’s silent problems is immense. Toyota’s future is uncertain. The Toyota brand has been exposed. And unfortunately, Toyota has no one to blame but itself. They brought this on, and now owners of Toyota vehicles are suffering and Toyota’s employees exposed. I expect that next week will turn up some new information.

Toyota’s Silent Problem Crisis

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

The opening paragraph in the Wall Street Journal captures the essence of Toyota’s problems, but more importantly Toyota’s silent problems. The article A Crisis Made in Japan by Jeff Kingston, director of Asian Studies at Temple University states,

In Japan there is a proverb, “If it stinks, put a lid on it.” Alas, this seems to have been Toyota’s approach to its burgeoning safety crisis, initially denying, minimizing and mitigating the problems involving brakes that don’t brake and accelerators that have a mind of their own. President Akio Toyoda, grandson of the founder, was MIA for two weeks and the company has appeared less than forthcoming about critical safety issues, risking the trust of its customers world-wide.

The article further states: It is not surprising that Toyota’s response has been dilatory and inept, because crisis management in Japan is grossly undeveloped. Over the past two decades, I cannot think of one instance where a Japanese company has done a good job managing a crisis. The pattern is all too familiar, typically involving slow initial response, minimizing the problem, foot dragging on the product recall, poor communication with the public about the problem and too little compassion and concern for consumers adversely affected by the product. Whether it’s exploding televisions, fire-prone appliances, tainted milk or false labeling, in case after case companies have shortchanged their customers by shirking responsibility until the accumulated evidence forces belated disclosure and recognition of culpability.

Japanese firms often seek to cover up or fudge the facts and the people communicating with the media and public often do not have the information they need to do their job. The absence of a structure to quickly get accurate information to top management hampers an accurate and adequate response. That leaves management unprepared to deal with media questioning and conveys an image of stonewalling and indifference.

This article by Jeff Kingston is a must-read if you want to get your arms around how Toyota’s crisis started, how it grew, and eventually how it exploded. It also points to why Toyota’s problem might be far from over and why its aftermath may continue to linger into the future. In my book, Without Warning, I write, There is little doubt that participating in and winning in a world that is connected, mobile and increasingly transparent can be challenging, creating a multitude of problems for political and business leaders alike, and their organizations. The problems one is expected to solve arrive with risks attached. The potential for faulure is real. At times, the opportunity for a happily ever after ending appears remote at best. Yet this is the sandbox where most political and business leaders play, and at times are asked to leave. It’s also this same sandbox where many followers find themselves, contemplating whether to follow their leaders in the games they play or to pursue a different path, one they believe they can truly make a difference.

Toyota’s problems are real, and everyone must ask, “Are there more surprises in the grass?”  Time will tell.

Be the one to see it coming!

The first leadership book to point out the problem, then hand-deliver the solution.

Without Warning - Rondey Johnson

Learn More

Order Info